Skip to main content
AI SoftwareCorporation

Technology ConsultingTechnology Consulting

Make AI and cloud decisions you can defend and deliver

We help you decide where AI will pay off, which cloud platform fits, what to modernize first and whether to build or buy, and put each decision in writing.

Two people's hands point at technical drawings spread across a table.

Outcomes

Written reasoning, a plan ready to build

  • Decisions you can defend

    Each recommendation shows the options considered, the evidence and the trade-⁠offs, so you can explain the choice to your board, auditors or investors.

  • A plan delivery can start from

    Roadmaps end in a first phase with scope, team shape, range estimates and success measures, so the build starts from a plan rather than another round of discovery.

  • Risks found before they get expensive

    Data gaps, security weaknesses, lock-⁠in and hidden dependencies surface during the assessment, when they cost less to plan around than to discover halfway through a build.

  • Free to deliver it with anyone

    You own the documents you pay for, and any capable team can deliver the plan: yours, another vendor or ours. There is no obligation to hire us for the build.

Capabilities

Decisions we help leadership teams make

Each engagement starts from one question, whether it comes from your board, an investor or your engineers, and is scoped and contracted on its own.

AI strategy and readiness

We find where AI would remove real work or improve decisions, check whether your data and controls can support each idea, and rank the use cases worth funding first.

  • Workflows, data sources, access rules and risks
  • Workshops with operations, data, security and compliance
  • Scored use-⁠case portfolio and data readiness findings
  • Pilot briefs with acceptance criteria, ready to build

Cloud strategy and platform selection

We compare AWS, Azure and Google Cloud, and hosting models from serverless to Kubernetes, against your workloads, skills, licenses, data residency rules and budget.

  • Workloads, licenses, contracts and current run costs
  • Sessions with finance, security and platform teams
  • Platform decision record with cost ranges per option
  • Adoption roadmap and a planned first migration wave

Architecture reviews and modernization roadmaps

We test your systems against the scenarios that matter, such as peak load, a failed region or a new market, then decide with you what to keep, improve, replace or retire.

  • Code, infrastructure, incident history and dependencies
  • Scenario workshops with architects and on-⁠call engineers
  • Ranked risk register and target architecture
  • Roadmap split into independently releasable slices

Technical due diligence

For investors and acquirers, we test a target’s technology against the investment thesis: scalability, security, hosting costs, key-⁠person risk and the cost of fixing what we find.

  • Repositories, cloud accounts and data room, read-⁠only
  • Interviews with the target’s technical leaders
  • Findings rated by severity, with remediation ranges
  • A post-⁠close plan for the new owners

Build-⁠or-⁠buy and vendor selection

Before you sign a platform contract or fund a custom build, we score the options on fit, total cost, lock-⁠in and risk, with vendors demonstrating your scenarios, not their scripts.

  • Requirements, contracts, data export and exit terms
  • Scoring panel of users, IT, security and procurement
  • Weighted comparison and a signed-⁠off decision record
  • Implementation plan for the chosen option

Fractional CTO and engineering leadership

A named technology leader works with your executive team part-⁠time to set direction, oversee delivery and shape the engineering team, planning the handover to a permanent hire from the start.

  • Roadmap, org structure, delivery metrics and budget
  • Sessions with your CEO, board and engineering leads
  • Technology strategy, hiring plan and board updates
  • Oversight of in-⁠house and vendor delivery

Approach

One question, real options, a decision

  1. Step 1: Frame the decision

    We agree on the question, who makes the call, the constraints and when you need an answer, so the work aims at a decision rather than a report.

    Activities

    • Kickoff with the sponsor and the decision owner
    • Interview list, document requests and access agreed
    • Criteria for a good recommendation set upfront

    You receive

    • A short charter naming the question, owner, scope and deadline
  2. Step 2: Gather the evidence

    We interview the people who run, build and pay for your systems, then check what they tell us against the artifacts: code, architecture, data, contracts, incidents and bills.

    Activities

    • Interviews and workshops across business, IT and finance
    • Hands-⁠on review of code, infrastructure and data
    • Read-⁠only access, with no changes to production

    You receive

    • Current-⁠state findings, each tied to its evidence
  3. Step 3: Compare real options

    We set out the realistic options, including leaving things as they are, and score them against criteria you have approved. Where uncertainty is highest, a short spike or proof of concept replaces opinion with data.

    Activities

    • Options scored against weighted, agreed criteria
    • Cost and effort estimated as ranges, with assumptions stated
    • Spikes on the riskiest technical assumptions

    You receive

    • Option comparison with trade-⁠offs and risks
    • Draft architecture decision records
  4. Step 4: Recommend and decide

    We walk your decision-⁠makers through the recommendation, the evidence and what we advise against, then record the decision and the reasoning behind it.

    Activities

    • Challenge session with your architects and engineers
    • Readout for your leadership team, board or investment committee

    You receive

    • Recommendation report and signed-⁠off decision records
    • Sequenced roadmap with dependencies and risks
  5. Step 5: Hand over to delivery

    We scope the roadmap’s first phase and brief whoever will build it: our teams, your engineers or another vendor. If you want continuity, we stay on to review architecture as the work proceeds.

    Activities

    • First phase broken into epics with range estimates
    • Team shape, skills and success measures defined
    • Walkthroughs of the plan with the delivery team

    You receive

    • A delivery-⁠ready first phase
    • Optional architecture oversight during the build

Deliverables and fit

Documents you own, whoever builds next

What you receive

8 deliverables
  • Scored AI use-⁠case portfolio, data readiness findings and pilot briefs
  • AI data-⁠handling and governance rules, agreed with security and compliance
  • Cloud platform decision with cost ranges, an operating model and an adoption roadmap
  • Architecture review with a ranked risk register and a target architecture
  • Modernization roadmap marking each system keep, improve, replace or retire
  • Due diligence report with severity-⁠rated findings, remediation ranges and a post-⁠close plan
  • Build-⁠or-⁠buy comparison covering fit, total cost of ownership, lock-⁠in and exit terms
  • Decision records, an executive readout and a first phase scoped for delivery
Seen from behind, a person stands at a whiteboard covered in a flowchart and sketches of app screens.
Options mapped on the whiteboard before anything is written up

A good fit if

  • Leadership wants an AI plan, but nobody has tested which ideas your data can support
  • You’re choosing a cloud platform, a vendor product or a custom build and want the trade-⁠offs in writing
  • A core system is holding the business back and you need a sequenced plan before asking for budget
  • You’re investing in or acquiring a software business and need its technology assessed
  • You need technology leadership now, before a full-⁠time CTO hire makes sense
  • A previous strategy produced slides, but nothing your teams could deliver

Engagement models

Advice on its own, or the build that follows

The models that usually suit this service. You can switch as the work changes.

  • Project delivery

    Assessments, roadmaps, due diligence and vendor selection, each with a set scope and contracted on its own.

  • Dedicated team

    The build that follows, if you choose us for it, with the context from the assessment carried over.

Technology

Frameworks we assess against

Listed so you can check the fit with your stack. None of them implies a partnership or certification.

Tools and platforms

  • AWS Well-Architected
  • Azure Well-Architected
  • Google Cloud Well-Architected
  • Amazon Bedrock
  • Azure OpenAI
  • Google Vertex AI
  • NIST AI RMF
  • OWASP Top 10 for LLMs
  • FinOps Framework
  • DORA metrics
  • Architecture decision records
  • C4 model
  • SonarQube
  • Snyk

Illustrative scenario

Illustrative scenarioTesting an acquisition target’s platform and AI claims before signingRead the scenarioHide the scenario
Illustrative scenario

Testing an acquisition target’s platform and AI claims before signing

An investor’s deal team weighing the acquisition of a vertical software company whose growth plan depends on larger customers and new AI features.

Challenge
Management says the platform will scale to larger customers and that its AI features are hard to copy. The deal team cannot tell how far the code, the hosting setup and the target’s data rights support those claims, and the timetable leaves no room for surprises after signing.
Approach
  1. 1Turn the investment thesis into specific technical questions, agreed with the deal team before the review starts
  2. 2Review repositories, cloud accounts and incident history with read-⁠only access, and scan for code quality, vulnerable dependencies and license obligations
  3. 3Interview the target’s technical leaders about architecture, delivery practices and who holds critical knowledge
  4. 4Trace how each AI feature works: which models it calls, which customer data it uses under what contract terms, and what each request costs
  5. 5Rate findings by severity with remediation ranges, raise deal-⁠relevant issues as they surface, and draft a post-⁠close plan
Outcome
The deal team negotiates knowing which claims hold up and which risks need fixing early in ownership. The post-⁠close plan gives the new owners a prioritized first phase that the target’s engineers, our teams or another vendor can deliver.
Ask about a project like this

FAQ

Questions before you commission advice

Ask a question

What do we actually receive at the end?

You receive written recommendations with the evidence and trade-⁠offs behind them, decision records for each significant choice, and a sequenced roadmap whose first phase is scoped for delivery. The exact set depends on the engagement: an AI readiness assessment ends with a scored use-⁠case portfolio and pilot briefs, and due diligence ends with a severity-⁠rated findings report. Deliverables are named in the proposal, and they are yours to keep.

Won’t you just recommend that we hire you to build it?

It is a fair question, so we write every plan for any capable team to deliver: your engineers, another vendor or us. You own the documents and are under no obligation to use us afterward. If we would benefit from one of the options, or have a commercial relationship with a vendor under evaluation, we say so in writing before you decide.

Is it too early for an AI strategy if our data is messy?

Usually not. Part of a readiness assessment is finding out what your data supports today: some use cases work with the documents and records you already have, while others need data work first. The roadmap schedules that data work ahead of the use cases that depend on it, so you find the gaps before funding a build rather than halfway through one.

What does technical due diligence cover?

It covers architecture, code quality, scalability, security, open-⁠source licensing, hosting costs, delivery practices and key-⁠person risk, each judged against the plans in your investment thesis. We work under the deal’s confidentiality terms, with read-⁠only access to repositories and cloud accounts, and speak with the target’s team as the deal process allows. Anything that could change the deal is raised as soon as we find it, not held back for the final report.

How does a fractional CTO engagement work?

A named technology leader joins your leadership team part-⁠time, for an agreed scope and period: setting technology direction, reviewing architecture and vendor decisions, shaping the engineering team and reporting to your board. Decision rights are written down at the start, so everyone knows which calls the fractional CTO makes and which stay with you. The exit is planned from the beginning, including defining the permanent role and helping you interview for it.

Next step

Which decision is in front of you?

Describe the system, process or decision in front of you. Expect questions back, a sensible first step and a fitting engagement model.

First step
A conversation about the problem, your systems and constraints
You leave with
A view on whether we can help, and a sensible first step
Before any work
A written proposal covering scope, team, approach and terms
Commitment
None until you approve that proposal